David Kuhn

Filed under: — tkm November 16, 2005 @ 8:0 am
  • Solicitor David Kuhn’s Term ended 1-7-08.

    After the November 7, 2007 Election and the defeat of David Kuhn by Michael Jones Kuhn never attended another City Council Meeting. There were still 4 meetings of Council scheduled until the end of the 2007 year.

    The status of the meetings Mr. Kuhn neglected to attend was the first and third meetings he sent Campbell in his place, the second meeting he sent Davis in his place and the fourth meeting he didn’t even bother ensuring the city had a representative for the Solicitor’s position.

    posted by tkm 1-15-08

    This page of my web blog will be dedicated to Portsmouth, Ohio’s own City Solicitor, David Kuhn. I will use this page to post documents I have collected and continue to collect on Mr. Kuhn’s job(?) in proving my opinion to justify my calling his poor performance as City Solicitor “Dereliction of Duty.”

    The reason I selected to give Mr. Kuhn this honor will become very apparent in the near future as I continue to regularly post more and more and more and……… documents to backup my opinion of why this man, and I say that lightly, that this man is not performing his job.

    So let the fun begin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    In the up and coming weeks the City Solicitor along with several members of our City Council will be working on changes to the City Charter. One of the modifications in question and changes mentioned in the Conference Session of 11/14/2005 was overhauling the Recall Section of our City Charter. This page of my blog will explain why we must continue to have the right of recall of our Public Officials, the Public Official’s who misrepresent and neglect the citizens, their constituents.

    A remark was made by 5th Ward Council Representative and Council President Howard Baughman to the press about changing the City Charter to mandate criminal charges of malfeasance, misfeasance, and/or nonfeasance as a requirement prior to distribution of recall ballots to a requestor.

    Provided on this page I will post documents demonstrating NO ACCOUNTABILITY present in the City Solicitor’s office. So who is going to determine violations of malfeasance, misfeasance, and/or nonfeasance in office prior to the issuance of petitions? Surely, they aren’t expecting our current City Solicitor, David Kuhn, to make that determination.

    My opinion is, he is so implicated and linked in these aforementioned crimes that a rational judgment could never be rendered by him. Nor would he know a violation of this magnitude if it hit him in the face. Because of his approval of this form of violations as norm by our Public Officials; and he is just as guilty. David Kuhn turns a blind eye to white color crime – to Crime, of malfeasance, misfeasance, and/or nonfeasance.

    posted by tkm 11-16-05

    CLICK:  2-12-07 David Kuhn to return half his raise to the City. 

    posted by tkm 2-13-07
    Will David Kuhn take the ethical path and refuse the $10,000. a year raise that was approved by Council or will he continue, IMO, on practicing outside the laws of ethics?  See attached a document provided to Council and the Solicitor, at the September 25th 2006, Regular City Council Meeting.  The document is a copy from an opinion by the Ohio Ethics Commission, dated 12-5-01, Advisory Opinion 91-008.

    CLICK: 10-4-06 Kuhn takes the raise.  As a matter of record, not only did Kuhn accept the raise, he submitted his own paperwork for the raise.  Is that unethical or what?

    CLICK: 12-5-91 Ethics Commision Ruling – posted 9-28-06

    posted by tkm 11-13-06

    No Comments

    No comments yet.

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.